|
|
Post by Weirdo94 on Nov 16, 2008 21:03:14 GMT -5
Here's the deal. MasterEvilPrower (currently known as LightningClashesWithMoon1) has managed to get quite a large mob against her presence, as well as already getting banned before. So, here's the deal, we're doing a poll on if I should ban her or not...
The details go like this, if the vote isn't totally unanimous(aside from the obvious single vote of "no" that MEP herself will likely put in), then she stays, but if after a week there's nothing but "yes" votes, then the banhammer goes down.
The polls are open, have a good day.
(Also, any attempt to alter the poll, such as making an alt to vote for you, is instaban...This is serious business, here.)
|
|
|
|
Post by Kingpin on Nov 16, 2008 21:37:24 GMT -5
she doesn't deserve it... well not right now that is, look back, has she double posted since she came back? shes fixed the main reason she was originaly banned, thus, unless you aint very smart you can tell which I voted for, you guys can give me crap all you want, I will only vote to ban someone if they deserve it and nothing less.
|
|
|
|
Post by Weirdo94 on Nov 16, 2008 21:54:46 GMT -5
Wow, that was quick...
Also, just for the record. The number one reason I wanted the ban was simply because she made an alt and the worry that she would go back to her old ways...not to mention her current posts were on the edge of disruptive...but either way, the people...er...person...has spoken...I still have my eye on her, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by ChaosStar on Nov 16, 2008 23:11:32 GMT -5
I cant trust her after she sent me that letter asking for my email address the day before she was banned
|
|
|
|
Post by RedPenguin on Nov 17, 2008 0:10:26 GMT -5
I believe the correct response would be why this would be up in the first place? It honestly doesn't matter how much her behavior has improved to try and fit in here; what she has done before might as well happen again. She was banned for a reason and has decided to ban-dodge her way back in. Her posts still are far from reasonable quality, not to mention she threatened this place before with foul words (shall find specific thread later if it still exists). So I vote yes. Edit: found thread. Also. I made a seperate account,but now I heard of tails doll fan's forums,and its much better and funner. So she didn't threaten the place! >.>; Sorry my mind was foggy, but my main point was that she has said some harsh words before. Most of her rather inappropriate shenanigans are on that thread. |
|
|
|
Post by Akago on Nov 17, 2008 2:14:11 GMT -5
I don't think I even need to say my vote. Further evidence to support it: Ahem. Copy-paste spamming posts.Are NOT super special awesome.Edit: Just to provide evidence to show that this does have relivence, I'll back up my case. These are the timetags from the two posts in question. « Result #12 on Nov 16, 2008, 7:13pm » « Result #13 on Nov 16, 2008, 7:10pm » Three minutes apart and on her recent post search, right next to each other. While not a double post, I still think this goes under the problem of spamming. |
|
|
|
Post by Master Silver on Nov 17, 2008 15:09:58 GMT -5
I think my answer is obvious. BAN GET!
|
|
|
|
Post by TDF on Nov 17, 2008 16:22:26 GMT -5
I say that if someone makes a second account just to avert a ban/disable, the next account needs to be pwned.
(But I have to admit, it's fun to watch spammers be the asswipes they are. I'll miss laughing my ass of at her comments.)
|
|
|
|
Post by RedPenguin on Nov 24, 2008 16:58:36 GMT -5
More than a week has passed. Get on with the smiting already. :(
|
|
|
|
Post by madchaosdragon on Nov 26, 2008 22:57:46 GMT -5
What be goin' on here? Why exactly is this person getting banned again?
|
|
|
|
Post by Weirdo94 on Nov 28, 2008 17:33:27 GMT -5
Well, I said that if one person (Who isn't MEP herself) voted for "no" then no ban...
<.<...Gawd I feel like such a dope to this whole moderator thingamajig...I don't want to break my word for the vote but the reasons posted seem like good ones...To be honest, the only thing stopping me is that Quacker hasn't banned her in the many times he has visited and I feel he has a reason...
I'll try to get in touch with Quacker on this...though I'm THIIIIS close to coming to the conclusion of "Aw hell, ban her anyway, if you find out there was a mistake, you can always unban her!"
|
|
|
|
Post by TDF on Nov 28, 2008 18:04:57 GMT -5
Well, I said that if one person (Who isn't MEP herself) voted for "no" then no ban... <.<...Gawd I feel like such a dope to this whole moderator thingamajig...I don't want to break my word for the vote but the reasons posted seem like good ones...To be honest, the only thing stopping me is that Quacker hasn't banned her in the many times he has visited and I feel he has a reason... I'll try to get in touch with Quacker on this...though I'm THIIIIS close to coming to the conclusion of "Aw hell, ban her anyway, if you find out there was a mistake, you can always unban her!" Yeah, she isn't really a jabber, and she's somewhat improving. Also Weirdo, you can't 'un-ban' unlike other places, a ban is a perma-ban. You can keep her account suspended forever and un-suspend, but you can't un-ban. D= |
|
|
|
Post by Weirdo94 on Nov 28, 2008 23:28:00 GMT -5
Nonono, that's account deletion you're thinking of...A ban here is reversible but deletion is not...
Hell, I don't even have the power to delete accounts, just ban them, that's why I made that topic to Quacker a while back about how I banned a spamfag and asked him to carry forth deletion.
Anyway, part of me is still thinking I should lay out the ban for the disruptive reviving of old topics for no reason with just small one or two words posts, but for now I'll just say this is her final warning...one more offense and it's banhammer.
|
|
